Support community for TTG plugins and products.
NOTICE
The Turning Gate's Community has moved to a new home, at https://discourse.theturninggate.net.
This forum is now closed, and exists here as a read-only archive.
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The description of some albums (Cambodia, Laos), does not appear in Google Chrome, so it appears in other browsers ?
Furthermore the quality of large images is degraded, and always in Google Chrome ?
Has anyone any idea of the problem!
thank you in advance.
Philippe
Last edited by PhilippeH (2016-07-15 03:57:10)
Offline
not sure what you're referring to. Things look normal to me. Can you be more specific? provide screen shots of what you're seeing?
Rod
Just a user with way too much time on his hands.
www.rodbarbee.com
ttg-tips.com, Backlight 2/3 test site
Offline
Here are two screenshots, one with Chrome or no descriptions in the books, and the other with Firefox or descriptions are present. This is also the same with my laptop.
The presentation of large pictures with Google Chrome is less clear than in other browsers too!
I checked with my current site that is not in test, and the images are exactly the same with Firefox or Google!
Thank you
Philippe
Firefox
Firefox
Last edited by PhilippeH (2016-07-15 07:08:48)
Offline
Hmm. I'm seeing the same thing in Chrome and Firefox:
can't really comment on the image quality as I'm away from home and only using my laptop. But that being said, images look very similar to me in Chrome and Firefox
Rod
Just a user with way too much time on his hands.
www.rodbarbee.com
ttg-tips.com, Backlight 2/3 test site
Offline
On the screenshots that show you, I also see the same thing! But if you click on the gallery Laos or Cambodia are set albums, there you may see where the problem is!
Philippe
Offline
I think that's something for Matt to look at. On my Mac, the gallery description works in Safari, but not in Chrome.
In the album http://test.vuedailleurs.com/galleries/02-cambodge/, when I add following CSS code I get the description to show
figcaption {
width: 50%;
}
Single page view seems to be sharper with Safari than with Chrome too.
Daniel Leu | Photography
DanielLeu.com
My digital playground (eg, Backlight tips&tricks): lab.DanielLeu.com
Offline
I'm not able to reproduce this in my own album sets. Can you tell me all of your settings for the album set template?
What happens if you set a smaller Description Character Limit?
Offline
Hi Matthew,
I defined a character limit of 100, and 50, and still the same problem whether on Mac or Windows!
I must say that it works correctly on my iPhone with Google Chrome.
Here are my settings
The Grid
Margin-top: 36px
Margin-bottom: 24px
The Cells
Border: 1px
Border-radius: 0px
Margins: 6px
Album Info
Description Character Limit: 250
Text-align: center
Layout Style Descriptive
Album Max-width: 502px
Album Height: 200px
Album Padding: 10px
Thumbnail Max-width: 300px
Max. Columns: 2
Columns at Page Breakpoint: 2
Offline
All of this works just fine on my side.
On your site, I see you have some custom CSS. One of your rules is "margin-top: -20px;". When I remove that, all is well.
I'm not sure it's valid to put a negative margin on a relative positioned element. If you want to kill that space, then "top: -20px;" would be more appropriate, and that seems to work just fine.
Offline
Matthew thank you to have a look at my problem.
I do not think I could watch it all before Sunday night, but I'm fine on my busy!
Good late night and good luck.
Philippe
Offline
Good evening,
The albums description of problem is now resolved, following the recommendations of Matthew.
Thanks again.
By account there is always the image sharpness issue.
In the three browsers can I test my home, Safari, Firefox, Chrome, the sharpest images are in order: Firefox, Safari comes next, and finally chrome or she is really much worse than the rest !
Does anyone have any idea of the problem because my current site (built with EC4) in any browser images are still sharp!
Philippe
Offline
I just looked at my workplace quality large images with Internet Explorer.
I believe they are of lower quality than Firefox, but better than chrome!
All these differences in image quality is very strange for me!
Does anyone has an explanation?
Philippe
Offline
Philippe,
could you re-post your image quality question as a new topic? It really doesn't relate to the original topic of this thread and would be more helpful (for others searching similar problems) if it was under its own topic. Plus, somebody who might know the answer will be more likely to see it if it's under its own topic.
Rod
Just a user with way too much time on his hands.
www.rodbarbee.com
ttg-tips.com, Backlight 2/3 test site
Offline
Pages: 1